Bayesian Estimation of The Ex-Gaussian Distribution
Abstract
Fitting of the exponential modified Gaussian distribution to model reaction times and drawing conclusions from its estimated parameter values is one of the most popular method used in psychology. This paper aims to develop a Bayesian approach to estimate the parameters of the ex-Gaussian distribution. Since the chosen priors yield to posterior densities that are not of known form and that they are not always log-concave, we suggest to use the adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling method. Applications on simulated data and on real data are provided to compare this method to the standard maximum likelihood estimation method as well as the quantile maximum likelihood estimation. Results shows the effectiveness of the proposed Bayesian method by computing the root mean square error of the estimated parameters using the three methods.References
A. Gelman, and D. B. Rubin, Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statistical Science, vol. 7, pp. 457–472, 1992.
A. Heathcote, and S. Brown, Reply to Speckman and Rouder: A theoretical basis for QML, Psychonomic bulletin & review, vol. 11, pp. 577–578, 2004.
A. Heathcote, S. Brown, and D. J. K. Mewhort, Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions, Psychonomic bulletin & review, vol. 9, pp. 394–401, (2002).
D. Cousineau, S. Brown, and A. Heathcote, Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, vol. 36, pp. 742–756, 2004.
F. C. Donders, On the speed of mental processes: Attention and Performance II. and Trans, Reprinted from Acta Psychologica, vol. 30, pp. 412–430, 1896.
G. E. Box, and D. R. Cox, An analysis of transformations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), vol. 26, pp. 211–243, 1964.
G. Kulldorff, Estimation from grouped and partially grouped samples. Wiley: New York, 1961.
G. Petris and L. Tardella, HI: Simulation from distributions supported by nested hyperplanes. URL:https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/HI/, 2015.
H. Wainer, Speed vs reaction time as a measure of cognitive performance, Memory & Cognition, vol. 5, pp. 278–280, 1997.
J.H. Dawson, Probing structure-function relations in heme-containing oxygenases and peroxidases, Science, vol. 240, pp. 433–439, 1988.
J. N. Rouder, D. Sun, P. L. Speckman, J. Lu, and D. Zhou, A hierarchical Bayesian statistical framework for response time distributions, Psychometrika, vol 68, pp. 589–606, 2003.
J. N. Rouder, Are unshifted distributional models appropriate for response time?, Psychometrika, vol 70, pp. 377–381, 2005.
L.S. Christie, and R. D. Luce, Decision structure and time relations in simple choice behavior, Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, vol. 18, pp. 89–112, 1956.
M. Van Selst, and P. Jolicoeur, A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol. 47, pp. 631–650, 1994.
O. Kamari, and F. Buono, On extropy of past lifetime distribution, Ricerche di Matematica, pp. 1–11, 2020.
P. A. Luce, A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition, Perception & Psychophysics, vol 39, pp. 155–158, 1986.
P. Bonin, B. Laroche, C. Perret, Locus of word frequency effects in spelling to dictation: Still at the orthographic level., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 42, pp. 1814, 2016.
P. D. McCormack, and N. M. Wright, The positive skew observed in reaction time distributions, Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, vol 18, pp. 43, 1964.
R. A. Fisher, The logic of inductive inference., Journal of the royal statistical society, vol. 98, pp. 39–82, 1935.
R. H. Hohle, Inferred components of reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration, Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol 69, pp. 382–386, 1965.
R. Ratcliff, Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers, Psychological Bulletin, vol 114, pp. 510–532, 1993.
R. Ulrich, and J. Miller, Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 123, pp. 34, 1994.
S. Brown, A. Heathcote, QMLE: Fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, vol. 35, pp. 485–492, 2003.
S. L. Burbeck, and R. D. Luce, Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors, Perception & psychophysics, vol. 32, pp. 117–133, 1982.
T. Van Zandt, How to fit a response time distribution, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 7, pp. 424–465, 2000.
T. Van Zandt, Analysis of response time distributions, Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology, 2002.
V. Biscione, QMLE.zip (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/46330-qmle-zip), MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
W. E. Hockley, Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol 10, pp. 598, 1984.
W. J. McGill, Stochastic latency mechanisms, Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol 1, pp. 309–360, 1963.
W. R. Gilks, N. G. Best, and K. K. C. Tan, Adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling within Gibbs sampling, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), vol. 44, pp. 455–472, 1995.
W. R. Gilks, R. M. Neal, N. G. Best, and K. K. C. Tan, “Corrigendum: Adaptive Rejection Metropolis Sampling”, Applied Statistics, vol. 46, pp. 541–542, 1997.
W. Schwarz, he ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times., Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, vol. 33, pp. 457–469, 2001.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
