The Functional Regression With Reconstructed Functions From Hybrid Principal Components Analysis: With EEG-fMRI Application

  • Mohammad Fayaz PhD Graduate in Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Alireza Abadi Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
  • Soheila Khodakarim Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Keywords: Functional Data Analysis; Hybrid Principal Component; Multiple Functional Covariates; Functional Regression; EEG; fMRI

Abstract

Objective: In this article, we reconstruct the hybrid data with hybrid principal component analysis (HPCA) as a feature extraction step and model them with functional regression as a modeling step, and comparing models and choose the best number of HPCA based on the prediction accuracy as an evaluation step. Method: We decompose the hybrid data to the eigencomponents with HPCA. The reconstructed data from HPCA were divided into the training and testing dataset. The function-on-function signal compression and scalar-on-function regressions were used.  Three simulation scenarios and their applications in the neuroimaging datasets (EEG-fMRI) were studied. The number of HPCA was selected with the mean squared prediction error (MSPE). Result: The simulation shows that the raw data, reconstructed from the first and all HPCAs for the training dataset has median MSPE 0.1001, 0.0028, and 0.0174 respectively, and for the testing, the dataset has 0.3207, 0.1118, and 0.2484 respectively. The EEG-fMRI suggests that in both auditory and visual tasks and standard and target stimuli for different regions of the brain the first HPCA has the smallest MSPE. Conclusions: We conclude this method improves the prediction accuracy of the experiments with the EEG datasets. And we recommend that instead of using the functional PCA on the desired dimension, reconstruct the data with HPCA and average it on the other two dimensions for functional regression models.

References

A. Beck, and M. Teboulle, A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems, SIAM Journal

on Imaging Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 183–202, 2009.

Johnson, R.A. and D.W. Wichern, Applied multivariate statistical analysis., Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Vol. 5. 2002.

Mandel, J., Use of the singular value decomposition in regression analysis., The American Statistician, 36(1): p. 15-24, 1982.

J.O. Ramsay and B.W. Silverman, Functional Data Analysis, Second Edition, Springer, 2005.

F. Ferraty and P. Vieu , Nonparametric functional data analysis: theory and practice., Springer Science and Business

Media, 2006.

G.M. James, T.J. Hastie and C.A. Sugar, Principal component models for sparse functional data., Biometrika, 87(3):

p. 587-6025, 2000.

A.-M Staicu, C.M. Crainiceanu and R.J. Carroll , Fast methods for spatially correlated multilevel functional data,

Biostatistics,11(2): p. 177-194, 2010.

M. Febrero‐Bande, P. Galeano and W. González‐Manteiga , Functional principal component regression and functional

partial least‐squares regression: An overview and a comparative study., International Statistical Review. 85(1): p. 61-83, 2017.

H. Hullait et al., Robust Function-on-Function Regression., Technometrics, p. 1-14,2020.

K. Chen and H.-G. Müller , Modeling repeated functional observations., Journal of the American Statistical

Association, 107(500): p. 1599-1609,2012.

S. Greven and et al. , Longitudinal functional principal component analysis, in Recent Advances in Functional Data

Analysis and Related Topics., Springer. p. 149-154,2011.

C.-Z Di and et al. , Multilevel functional principal component analysis., The annals of applied statistics,3(1): p. 458:2009.

K. Hasenstab and et al. , A multi‐dimensional functional principal components analysis of EEG data, Biometrics.

(3): p. 999-1009, 2017.

T. Kuenzer, S. Hörmann, and P. Kokoszka. , Principal component analysis of spatially indexed functions, Journal

of the American Statistical Association, p. 1-13,2020.

C. Liu, S. Ray, and G. Hooker , Functional principal component analysis of spatially correlated data, Statistics and

Computing. 27(6): p. 1639-1654,2017.

L. Zhou, et al., Reduced rank mixed effects models for spatially correlated hierarchical functional data., Journal of

the American Statistical Association. 105(489): p. 390-400,2010.

P. Reimherr and P. Kokoszka, Introduction to Functional Data Analysis, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group,2017.

R. Luo and X. Qi, Function-on-function linear regression by signal compression, Journal of the American Statistical

Association. 112(518): p. 690-705, 2017.

X. Qi and R. Luo, Function-on-function regression with thousands of predictive curves., Journal of Multivariate

Analysis, 163: p. 51-66, 2018.

C.M. Crainiceanu and A.J. Goldsmith , Bayesian functional data analysis using WinBUGS, Journal of statistical

software, 32(11), 2010.

D.R. Kowal and D.C. Bourgeois , Bayesian function-on-scalars regression for high-dimensional data, Journal of

Computational and Graphical Statistics, p. 1-10, 2020.

A. Scheffler and et al. , Hybrid principal components analysis for region-referenced longitudinal functional EEG data,

Biostatistics, 21(1): p. 139-157, 2020.

A.W. Scheffler and et al. , Covariate‐adjusted region‐referenced generalized functional linear model for EEG data,

Statistics in Medicine. 38(30): p. 5587-5602,2019.

G. Aneiros-Pérez and P. Vieu , Semi-functional partial linear regression, Statistics and Probability Letters, 76(11):

p. 1102-1110, 2006.

D. Liebl and F. Walders , Parameter regimes in partial functional panel regression., Econometrics and Statistics, 11:

p. 105-115, 2019.

M. Febrero-Bande, W. González-Manteiga, and M.O. de la Fuente, Variable selection in functional additive regression

models., Computational Statistics. 34(2): p. 469-487,2019.

R. Christensen et al., Bayesian ideas and data analysis: an introduction for scientists and statisticians, CRC Press,

M. Fayaz, A. Abadi, and S. Khodakarim , The Comparison between Visually and Auditory Oddball Tasks in the EEG

Experiment with Healthy Subjects., Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies. 7(4): p. 249-258,2020.

J.M. Walz et al. , Simultaneous EEG–fMRI reveals a temporal cascade of task-related and default-mode activations

during a simple target detection task., Neuroimage, 102: p. 229-239,2014.

A. Delorme and S. Makeig , EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including

independent component analysis., Journal of neuroscience methods. 134(1): p. 9-21,2004.

C.A. Kothe and S. Makeig, BCILAB: a platform for brain–computer interface development. Journal of neural engineering, Journal of neural engineering, 10(5): p. 056014,2013.

Published
2022-06-25
How to Cite
Fayaz, M., Abadi, A., & Khodakarim, S. (2022). The Functional Regression With Reconstructed Functions From Hybrid Principal Components Analysis: With EEG-fMRI Application. Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing, 10(3), 890-903. https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1437
Section
Research Articles