Analyzing Performance Discrepancies: U-Net vs TransUNet for Aircraft Emergency Landing Site Detection
Keywords:
Unet, TransUnet, Vision Transformer, Semantic Segmentation, Emergency Landing Site Detection
Abstract
In the context of aviation, forced landings are unwanted events that can happen to an aircraft during its flight trajectory. They can be due engine malfunctions, adverse weather conditions and other sudden situations. For this reason, and to ensure passengers' safety, it is imperative to develop methods and procedures to detect potential sites that can be used as emergency landing areas during these crisis situations. Traditionally, pilots use visual indicators to detect such landing sites, this ability can varry from a pilot to another depending on experience, aircraft altitude and other environmental conditions. Such circumstances can make this visual detection task highly difficult. Image segmentation is one of the possible solutions that can be implemented in identifying potential emergency landing sites for aircraft. Precise segmentation should improve on the effective identification of safe landing areas, thereby enhancing aviation safety protocols in general. In this context, the traditional U-Net \cite{unet} architecture has shown exceptional results regarding segmentation tasks. However, a new approach derived from U-Net and incorporating transformers in its encoder, known as TransUNet, has demonstrated promising results, surpassing in some cases those of U-Net. This study investigates the performance of TransUNet compared to traditional U-Net for aircraft emergency landing site detection. Both architectures were implemented, trained, and evaluated using our novel dataset tailored for this purpose. Our work demonstrate that U-Net outperforms TransUNet in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency in this specific segmentation task. In particular, U-Net exhibited superior performance by improving segmentation precision from 80% up to 88% in the testing set. Moreover, the mean Intersection-Over-Union, a metric for segmentation accuracy, have also seen an improvement of 77% for U-Net over 73% for TransUNet. These results emphasise the power of the traditional U-Net architecture for this critical application, underlying its practical relevance in enhancing aviation safety.
Published
2025-10-15
How to Cite
Illi, A., EL HADAJ, S., BOUZAACHANE, K., & EL GUARMAH, E. M. (2025). Analyzing Performance Discrepancies: U-Net vs TransUNet for Aircraft Emergency Landing Site Detection. Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing. https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-2753
Issue
Section
ICCSAI'24
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).