Volatility Modelling of the BRICS Stock Markets
Abstract
Volatility modelling is a key factor in equity markets for risk and portfolio management. This paper focuses on the use of a univariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models for modelling volatility of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) stock markets. The study was conducted under the assumptions of seven error distributions that include the normal, skewed-normal, Student’s t, skewed-Student’s t, generalized error distribution (GED), skewed-GED and the generalized hyperbolic (GHYP) distribution. It was observed that using an ARMA(1, 1)-GARCH(1, 1) model, volatilities of the Brazilian Bovespa and the Russian IMOEX markets can both be well characterized (or described) by a heavy-tailed Student’s t distribution, while the Indian NIFTY market’s volatility is best characterized by the generalized hyperbolic (GHYP) distribution. Also, the Chinese SHCOMP and South African JALSH markets’ volatilities are best described by the skew-GED and skew-Student’s t distribution, respectively. The study further observed that the persistence of volatility in the BRICS markets does not follow the same hierarchical pattern under the error distributions, except under the skew-Student’s t and GHYP distributions where the pattern is the same. Under these two assumptions, i.e. the skew-Student’s t and GHYP, in a descending hierarchical order of magnitudes, volatility with persistence is highest in the Chinese market, followed by the South African market, then the Russian, Indian and Brazilian markets, respectively. However, under each of the five non-Gaussian error distributions, the Chinese market is the most volatile, while the least volatile is the Brazilian market.References
G. Adua, P. Alagidede, and A. Karimu, Stock return distribution in the BRICS, Review of Development Finance Vol. 5, pp. 98–109, 2015.
S. Ashour, and M. Abdel-Hameed, Approximate skew normal distribution, Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 1, pp. 341–350, 2010.
A. A. Azzalini, Class of distributions which includes the normal ones, Scand J Stat, pp. 171–178, 1985.
A. Azzalini, and A. Capitanio, Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew-t distribution, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, vol. 65, pp. 367–389, 2003.
O. Barndorff-Nielsen, Exponentially decreasing distributions for the logarithm of particle size, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1977.
T. Bollerslev, Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327, 1986.
M. D. Branco, and D. K. Dey, A general class of multivariate skew-elliptical distributions, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 99–113, 2001.
W. Christensen, Model Selection Using Information Criteria (Made Easy in SAS), University of California, Los Angeles,
wchristensen@ucla.edu., https://github.com/wendychristensen, 2018.
M. Eling, Fitting asset returns to skewed distributions: Are the skew-normal and skew-student good models?, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, vol. 59, pp. 45–56, 2014.
M. Emerson, Do the BRICS Make a Bloc?, CEPS Commentary, https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/do-brics-make-bloc/, 2012.
R. Engle, Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 987–1006, 1982.
R. Engle, GARCH 101: the use of ARCH/GARCH models in applied econometrics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 15, pp. 157–168, 2001.
R. Engle, and T. Bollerslev, Modelling the persistence of conditional variances, Econometric Reviews, vol. 5, pp. 1–50, 1986.
T. J. Fisher, and C. M. Gallagher, New weighted portmanteau statistics for time series goodness of fit testing, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 107, pp. 777–787, 2012.
G. Galloppo, V. Paimanova, and M. Aliano, Volatility and Liquidity in Eastern Europe Financial Markets under Efficiency and Transparency Conditions, Economics and Sociology, vol. 8, pp. 70–92, 2015.
A. Ghalanos, Introduction to the rugarch package (version 1.3-1), from https://cran.rproject.
org/web/packages/rugarch/vignettes/Introduction to the rugarch package.pdf, 2015.
T. Grieb, and M. G. Reyes, Random walk tests for Latin American equity indexes and individual firms, Journal of Financial Research, vol. 22, pp. 371–383, 1999.
E. L. Hamaker, H. P. Van, R. M. Kuiper, and H. Hoijtink, Model selection based on information criteria in multilevel modeling, in Hox, J. J. & Roberts, J. K (Eds.), Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis, pp. 231–255, 2011.
H. Herwartz, and C. M. Hafner, A Lagrange multiplier test for causality in variance, Economics Letters, vol. 93, pp. 137–141, 2006.
C. Ijumba, Multivariate analysis of the BRICS financial markets from http://hdl.handle.net/10413/11309, (Unpublished master’s thesis), University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, 2013.
IMF (International Monetary Fund), World Economic Outlook, Hopes, Realities, Risks, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/pdf/text.pdf., 2013.
S. Javed, B. A. Aldalaien, and U. Husain, Volatility and analysis of BRICS stocks, Journal of Business & Financial Affairs, from https://www.hilarispublisher.com/business-and-management-journals.html, ISSN: 2167-0234, Vol. 9, 2020.
R. E. Kennedy, and J. L. Sharma, A comparative analysis of stock price behaviour of the Bombay, London and New York stock exchanges, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 12, pp. 391–413, 1977.
Y. H. Lee, and T. Y. Pai, REIT volatility prediction for skew-GED distribution of the GARCH model, Expert Systems with
Applications, Cardiff, vol. 37, pp. 4737–4741, 2010.
F. Li, A. S. Cohen, S. Kim, and S. Cho, Model Selection Methods for Mixture Dichotomous IRT Models, Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 33, pp. 353–373, 2009.
B. Lipika, Multivariate Extreme Value Theory with an Application to Climate Data in the Western Cape Province, Department of statistical sciences, University of Cape Town, 2018.
M. R. Makhwiting, M. Lesaoana, and C. Sigauke, Modelling volatility and financial market risk of shares on the Johannesburg stock exchange, African Journal of Business Management, vol. 6, pp. 8065–8070, 2012.
A. J. McNeil, and R. Frey, Estimation of Tail Related Risk Measure for Heteroscedastic Financial Time Series: An Extreme Value Approach, J. Empir. Financ., vol. 7, pp. 271–300, 2000.
A. Nassif, C. A. Feijo, and E. Araujo, Structural change, catching up and falling behind in the BRICS: A comparative analysis based on trade patterns and Thirlwall’s law, PSL Quarterly Review, vol. 69, pp. 373–421, 2016.
E. B. Ole, T. Mikosch, and S. I. Resnick, Levy Processes: Theory and Applications, Birkhauser, 2013.
X. Y. Peng, The downward trend of China’s foreign exchange reserves has been formed, in Caixin, from
http://opinion.caixin.com/2015-10- 09/100861118.html, 2015.
M. Pourahmadi, Construction of skew-normal random variables: Are they linear combination of normals and half-normals, J. Stat. Theory Appl., vol. 3, pp. 314–328, 2007.
A. A. Romero, and K. M. Kasibhatla, Volatility dynamics and volatility forecasts of equity returns in BRIC Countries, Journal of business & economic studies, vol. 19, 2013.
A. Salisu, and R. Gupta, Oil shocks and stock market volatility of the BRICS: A GARCH-MIDAS approach, Global Finance Journal, 2020.
C. Sigauke, D. Maposa, E. Mudimu, and P. Nyamugure, Volatility modeling using {ARIMA-GARCH} models in a hyperinflationary economic environment: The {Zimbabwean} experience, SIAM In Peer-reviewed Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Statistical Association, 2010.
B. W. Silverman, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London, 1986.
R. L Smith, Statistics of extremes, with applications in environment, insurance, and finance, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, pp. 54–60, 2003.
H. Tian, The BRICS and the G20, China & World Economy, vol. 24, pp. 111–126, 2016.
D. Wilson, and R. Puroshothaman, Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050, Global Economic Paper, no. 99, Goldman Sachs, New York, 2003.
J. Zhang, D. Zhang, J. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Volatility spill-overs between equity and bond markets: Evidence from G7 and BRICS, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, vol. 16, pp. 205–217, 2013.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).